The Essential Role of an Enlightened Witness in Society
By Alice Miller, Ph. D.
Since adolescence I have always wondered why people take
pleasure in humiliating others. Clearly the fact that some people are
sensitive to the suffering of others proves that the destructive urge
is not a universal aspect of human nature. So why do some tend to solve
their problems by violence while others don't?
Philosophy failed to answer my question, and the Freudian theory of the
death wish has never convinced me. It was only by closely examining the
childhood histories of murderers, especially mass murderers, that I began
to comprehend the roots of good and evil: not in the genes, as commonly
believed, but often in the earliest days of life. Today, it is inconceivable
to me that a child who comes into the world among attentive, loving and
protective parents could become a predatory monster. And in the childhood
of the murderers who later became dictators, I have always found a nightmarish
horror, a record of continual lies and humiliation, which upon the attainment
of adulthood, impelled them to acts of merciless revenge on society. These
vengeful acts were always garbed in hypocritical ideologies, purporting
that the dictator's exclusive and overriding wish was the happiness of
his people. In this way, he unconsciously emulated his own parents who,
in earlier days, had also insisted that their blows were inflicted on
the child for his own good. This belief was extremely widespread a century
ago, particularly in Germany.
I found it logical that a child beaten often would quickly pick up the
language of violence. For him, this language became the only effective
means of communication available. Yet what I found to be logical was apparently
not so to most people.
When I began to illustrate my thesis by drawing on the examples of Hitler
and Stalin, when I tried to expose the social consequences of child abuse,
I encountered fierce resistance. Repeatedly I was told, "I, too,
was a battered child, but that didn't make me a criminal." When I
asked for details about their childhood, I was always told of a person
who loved them, but was unable to protect them. Yet through his or her
presence, this person gave them a notion of trust, and of love.
I call these persons helping witnesses. Dostoyevsky, for instance, had
a brutal father, but a loving mother. She wasn't strong enough to protect
him from his father, but she gave him a powerful conception of love, without
which his novels would have been unimaginable. Many have also been lucky
enough to find later both enlightened and courageous witnesses, people
who helped them to recognize the injustices they suffered, to give vent
to their feelings of rage, pain and indignation at what happened to them.
People who found such witnesses never became criminals.
Anyone addressing the problem of child abuse is likely to be faced with
a very strange finding: it has frequently been observed that parents who
abuse their children tend to mistreat and neglect them in ways resembling
their own treatment as children, without any conscious memory of their
own experiences. It is well known that fathers who bully their children
through sexual abuse are usually unaware that they had themselves suffered
the same abuse. It is mostly in therapy, even if ordered by the courts,
that they discover, stupefied, their own history, and realize thereby
that for years they have attempted to act out their own scenario, just
to get rid of it.
How can this be explained? After studying the matter for years, it seems
clear to me that information about abuse inflicted during childhood is
recorded in our body cells as a sort of memory, linked to repressed anxiety.
If, lacking the aid of an enlightened witness, these memories fail to
break through to consciousness, they often compel the person to violent
acts that reproduce the abuse suffered in childhood, which was repressed
in order to survive. The aim is to avoid the fear of powerlessness before
a cruel adult. This fear can be eluded momentarily by creating situations
in which one plays the active role, the role of the powerful, towards
a powerless person.
But this is not an easy path to rid oneself of unconscious fears. And
this is why the offence is ceaselessly repeated. A steady stream of new
victims must be found, as recently demonstrated by the paedophile scandals
in Belgium. To his dying day, Hitler was convinced that only the death
of every single Jew could shield him from the fearful and daily memory
of his brutal father. Since his father was half Jewish, the whole Jewish
people had to be exterminated. I know how easy it is to dismiss this interpretation
of the Holocaust, but I honestly haven't yet found a better one. Besides,
the case of Hitler shows that hatred and fear cannot be resolved through
power, even absolute power, as long as the hatred is transferred to scapegoats.
On the contrary, if the true cause of the hatred is identified, is experienced
with the feelings that accompany this recognition, blind hatred of innocent
victims can be dispelled. Sex criminals stop their depredations if they
manage to overcome their amnesia and mourn their tragic fate, thanks to
the empathy of an enlightened witness. Old wounds can be healed if exposed
to the light of day. But they cannot be repudiated by revenge.
A Japanese crew shot a film of therapeutic work in a prison in Arizona,
where the method was based, inter alia, on my books. I was sent the video
cassette and found the results very revealing. The inmates worked in groups,
talked a lot about their childhood, and some of them said, "I've
been all over the place, and killed innocent people to avoid the feelings
I have today. But I know that I can bear these feelings in the group,
where I feel safe. I no longer need to run around and kill, I'm at home
here, and I recognize what happened. The past recedes, and my anger along
with it."
For this process to succeed, the adult who has grown up without helping
witnesses in his childhood needs the support of enlightened witnesses,
people who have understood and recognized the consequences of child abuse.
In an informed society, adolescents can learn to verbalize their truth
and to discover themselves in their own story. They will not need to avenge
themselves violently for their wounds, or to poison their systems with
drugs, if they have the luck to talk to others about their early experiences,
and succeed in grasping the naked truth of their own tragedy. To do this,
they need assistance from persons aware of the dynamics of child abuse,
who can help them address their feelings seriously, understand them and
integrate them, as part of their own story, instead of avenging themselves
on the innocent.
I have wrongly been attributed the thesis according to which every victim
inevitably becomes a persecutor, a thesis that I find totally false, indeed
absurd. It has been proved that many adults have had the good fortune
to break the cycle of abuse through knowledge of their past. Yet I can
certainly aver that I have never come across persecutors who weren't victims
in their childhood, though most of them don't know it because their feelings
are repressed. The less these criminals know about themselves, the more
dangerous they are to society. So I think it is crucial for the therapist
to grasp the difference between the statement, "every victim ultimately
becomes a persecutor," which is false, and "every persecutor
was a victim in his childhood," which I consider true. The problem
is that, feeling nothing, he remembers nothing, realizes nothing, and
this is why surveys don't always reveal the truth. Yet the presence of
a warm, enlightened witness - therapist, social aid worker, lawyer, judge
- can help the criminal unlock his repressed feelings and restore the
unrestricted flow of consciousness. This can initiate the process of escape
from the vicious circle of amnesia and violence.
—Alice Miller, 1997
Top