Alice Miller, child abuse and mistreatment

APRIL 2010

MARCH 2010

FEBRUARY 2010

JANUARY 2010

DECEMBER 2009

NOVEMBER 2009

OCTOBER 2009

SEPTEMBER 2009

AUGUST 2009

JULY 2009

JUNE 2009

MAY 2009

APRIL 2009

MARCH 2009

FEBRUARY 2009

JANUARY 2009

DECEMBER 2008

NOVEMBER 2008

OCTOBER 2008

SEPTEMBER 2008

AUGUST 2008

JULY 2008

JUNE 2008

MAY 2008

APRIL 2008

MARCH 2008

FEBRUARY 2008

JANUARY 2008

DECEMBER 2007

NOVEMBER 2007

OCTOBER 2007

SEPTEMBER 2007

AUGUST 2007

JULY 2007

JUNE 2007

MAY 2007

APRIL 2007

MARCH 2007

FEBRUARY 2007

JANUARY 2007

DECEMBER 2006

NOVEMBER 2006

OCTOBER 2006

SEPTEMBER 2006

AUGUST 2006

JULY 2006

JUNE 2006

MAY 2006

APRIL 2006

MARCH 2006

FEBRUARY 2006

JANUARY 2006

DECEMBER 2005

NOVEMBER 2005

OCTOBER 2005

SEPTEMBER 2005

AUGUST 2005

JULY 2005

The right title
Wednesday July 15, 2009







Dear Alice Miller,

I am curious why you think that I did not understand
your answer. I fully agreed with your answer that
the cause of denial is the fear from the parent's
agression/abuse that were already born to defend
their [the parents] flight from their truth.

All what I claimed was that my writing did not
state at all that intellectualisation is the cause of denial
[but rather it is the consequence of it].
Therefore your comment stating that intellectualization is
not the cause of denial - that is certainly true-
does not refer to my writing as it did not state such
thing. I consider that your comment is an independent
and important addition to my thoughts.

However, in its current state it might be rather confusing as it
makes the impression that in my writing I suggest
that intellectualisation is the cause of denial.

I would appreciate if you could point to the pertaining part of
my argument from which you concluded that I did not
understand your answer.

Related to the lethal consequences of denial, very recenlty
I saw a British movie entitled 'Hilary and Jackie'.
It was about the life of the extraordinarily gifted chello player
Jacquline du Pre. Even though the movie did not reveal her
true childhood story, there were some key sentences stating
that her musical gift awakened only admiration in people instead of
love. 'If I don't play the chello, am I nobody?'-she asked. Her unsuccesful
attemps to be loved and to be understood were failing and she got a lethal disesase, schelosis multiplex and eventually died of it.

It was a deeply moving and sad story from the perspective
of the abandoned child within her. The cry and suffering of her
inner child broke up in the very painful and eloquent voice of her chello
plays [eg. the Elgar piece] . But nobody [incuding herself, J. du Pre]
could hear the voice of the sufferings of the abandoned child within her
and provide love instead of admiration...

I find that denial operating in people surrounding her make them deaf
to hear the pain of the heart and blind to distinguish
admiration from love.

With gratitude,
ZN






AM: I didn't question your observation of intellectual blinders, I only wanted to make an addition by mentioning the fear as the cause of the flight from the painful memories. But now we changed the title according to your wish, and it is okay for us.

Top